Stanton T. Friedman

Friedman graduated from Linden High School and the University of Chicago, earning a Bachelor of Science in 1955 and a Master of Science degree in nuclear physics in 1956.[1]
Career in nuclear physics

Friedman was employed for 14 years as a nuclear physicist for such companies as General Electric (1956–1959), Aerojet General Nucleonics (1959–1963), General Motors (1963–1966), Westinghouse (1966–1968), TRW Systems (1969–1970), and McDonnell Douglas, where he worked on advanced, classified programs on nuclear aircraft, fission and fusion rockets, and compact nuclear power plants for space applications.[2] Since the 1980s, he has done related consultant work in the radon-detection industry. Friedman’s professional affiliations have included the American Nuclear Society, the American Physical Society, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and AFTRA.[citation needed]
UFO investigations and advocacy

In 1970, Friedman left full-time employment as a physicist to pursue the scientific investigation of UFOs. Since then, he has given lectures at more than 600 colleges and to more than 100 professional groups in 50 states, 10 provinces, and 19 countries outside the US.[2] Additionally, he has worked as a consultant on the topic. He has published more than 80 UFO-related papers and has appeared on many radio and television programs.[2] He has also provided written testimony to Congressional hearings and appeared twice at the United Nations.[2][3]

Friedman has consistently favoured use of the term “flying saucer” in his work, saying “Flying saucers are, by definition, unidentified flying objects, but very few unidentified flying objects are flying saucers. I am interested in the latter, not the former.”[2] Friedman used to refer to himself as “The Flying Saucer Physicist”, because of his degrees in nuclear physics and work on nuclear projects.[3]
Friedman’s positions regarding UFO phenomena

Friedman was the first civilian to document the site of the Roswell UFO incident,[4] and supports the hypothesis that it was a genuine crash of an extraterrestrial spacecraft.[5] In 1968 Friedman told a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives that the evidence suggests that Earth is being visited by intelligently controlled extraterrestrial vehicles.[6] Friedman also stated he believed that UFO sightings were consistent with magnetohydrodynamic propulsion.

In 1996, after researching and fact checking the Majestic 12 documents, Friedman said that there was no substantive grounds for dismissing their authenticity.[7]

In 2004, on George Noory’s Coast to Coast radio show, Friedman debated Seth Shostak, the SETI Institute’s Senior Astronomer. Like Friedman, Shostak also believes in the existence of intelligent life other than humans; however, unlike Friedman, he doesn’t believe such life is now on Earth or is related to UFO sightings.[8]

Friedman has hypothesized that UFOs may originate from relatively nearby sunlike stars.[2](p. 217)

A piece of evidence that he often cites with respect to this hypothesis is the 1964 star map drawn by alleged alien abductee Betty Hill during a hypnosis session, which she said was shown to her during her abduction. Astronomer Marjorie Fish constructed a three-dimensional map of nearby sun-like stars and claimed a good match from the perspective of Zeta Reticuli, about 39 light years distant. The fit of the Hill/Fish star maps was hotly debated in the December 1974 edition of Astronomy Magazine,[9][10] with Friedman and others defending the statistical validity of the match.

Friedman has stated strong views against SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) research. Friedman contests the implicit premise of SETI that there has been no extraterrestrial visitation of the planet, because it is his claim that SETI is seeking only signals, not extraterrestrial intelligence or beings. He maintains that the prominence and widespread public claims of those involved with SETI have tended to prevent serious research, including research by journalists, of UFOs.[2](p. 129)

Friedman has criticized Carl Sagan, a proponent of SETI, for ignoring empirical evidence, such as “600-plus UNKNOWNS” of Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14. Friedman argued that this empirical data directly contradicts Sagan’s claim in Other Worlds that the “reliable cases are uninteresting and the interesting cases are unreliable”. Specifically, Friedman refers to a table in Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 that he says “shows that the better the quality of the sighting, the more likely it was to be an ‘unknown’, and the less likely it was to be listed as containing ‘insufficient information'” [2](p. 42).
Public and scientific opinion

Friedman says of the response to his talks, “I know that most people are unfamiliar with the several large-scale scientific studies… because I ask, after I show a slide and ask about each one, ‘How many here have read this?’ Typically it is only one or two percent.” He says that a talk he gave to Canadian journalists in Saint John, New Brunswick, caused the attitudes of the journalists to change because “Attendees had had no idea there was so much solid information, as opposed to the tabloid nonsense they thought was the primary source of UFO data.” (p. 202)[2]

Friedman has argued that the majority of people believe UFOs exist and at least some groups of scientists do as well. Friedman (2008) refers to the following data in support of his position:[7]

Gallup Polls between 1966 and 1987 asked respondents the question: “Are UFOs something real, or just people’s imagination?”. Of those who took a position one way or the other, 61%, 64%, 68% and 60% took the position they are real in 1966, 1977, 1978 and 1987, respectively.
With respect to scientists, a poll was taken by Industrial Research and Development in 1971 and 1979. Of the respondents who took a position, 64% and 69% stated they believed UFOs either probably or definitely exist. Of this subgroup, 32% and 44% considered their origin to be Outer Space in 1971 and 1979, respectively. Of the rest of this subgroup, approximately half believed them to be natural phenomena and half were “undecided”.
Peter Sturrock also polled the membership of the American Astronomical Society and found that “the greater the amount of time one spent on reading UFO-related material, the more likely one is to accept their reality” (p. 210).[2]

Criticisms and controversies
For his criticism of the Search for extraterrestrial intelligence, see Search for extraterrestrial intelligence § Stanton Friedman.

Friedman is outspoken in his articulation of positions and in his criticism of UFO debunkers, often stating he is not an “apologist ufologist”. His positions are regarded as controversial in mainstream science and media, but Friedman claims to have received little opposition at his many lectures, most of which have been at colleges and universities, many to engineering societies and other groups of physicists[2] (p. 24). He has had a number of debates in the mainstream media, including one with UFO skeptic Michael Shermer on CNN.

Friedman has been criticized both by skeptics and other Roswell researchers for taking the position that there are no substantive grounds for dismissing the authenticity of some Majestic 12 documents. Friedman himself was the first to provide evidence that some of the documents are clearly hoaxes. For example, he showed that a supposed memo from Admiral Hillenkoetter to President Truman, dated February 17, 1948, was actually the emulation of a letter from Marshall to Roosevelt that was featured in the book The American MAGIC. Friedman has researched the MJ-12 documents since first becoming aware of them from Wiliam Moore and Jaime Shandera in 1984.[2][11] He addressed criticisms of the original documents in both sources. As an example, Philip J. Klass claimed lexicographic inconsistencies based on the use of Pica typeface in the Cutler-Twining memo and offered $100, in a challenge to Friedman, for each legitimate example of the use of the same style and size Pica type as used in the memo. Friedman provided 14 examples and was paid $1000 by Klass.[2]
Personal life

Friedman has been married twice. He first married Susie Virginia Porter; he divorced her in April 1974 (California, Divorce Index, 1966-1984; Los Angeles April 1974). He adopted three children with his first wife and had one daughter with his second wife, Marilyn. Friedman relocated to Marilyn’s native New Brunswick in the early 1980s.[12]


Flying Saucers & Science, June 2008, 320P.
Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience. Co-author Kathleen Marden. Career Press / New Page Books, 2007. ISBN 978-1-56414-971-8, ISBN 978-1-56924-741-9
Top Secret/MAJIC, Marlowe + Co. 2005. ISBN 1-56924-342-5. 296 pages, ISBN 978-1-56924-342-8
Crash at Corona: The Definitive Story of The Roswell Incident. Co-author Don Berliner, 1997. ISBN 978-1-931044-89-9
Science was Wrong: Startling truths about cures, theories, and inventions “They” declared impossible. Co-author Kathleen Marden. Pompton Plains, NJ: New Page Books. 2010.

Videos, VHS, DVD

UFOs: Stanton Friedman’s revelation – an interview with Stanton Friedman
2 DVDs – FLYING SAUCERS ARE REAL .jpg (VHS) Vol. 1, 1993, 84 mins. (Filmed at Kennedy Space Center) and FLYING SAUCERS ARE REAL Vol. 2, 1996 75 min for a Total Length of 159 minutes.
2006 151 Minute 2 disc DVD set “UFO SECRET MJ-12.” Mostly footage of Stan Friedman’s lecture at Aztec NM 2003 about Roswell and MJ-12.
Debate “Are Flying Saucers Real?” VHS. Informal Debate. Middle Tenn. State Univ. January 2004. Includes Q & no A’s.
UFOs Are Real (1979) VHS – 92 min.

You may also like...